The Public Policy
of
Casey v. Planned Parenthood
By Michael G. Smith
Conclusion
[Previous | Contents]
The abortion controversy has raged on for over twenty years and shows no signs of subsiding. The abortion controversy continues because there are compelling public policy reasons for ending legal abortion, such as abortion is murder, is inconsistent with feminism, supports the sexual revolution, and encourages other violence.
It has been said that the goal of family policy is the well-being of the family.{155} Whether the family is an intact nuclear family or a single mother, the well-being of the family can reasonably be construed to mean the antithesis of what abortion brings to a family. Abortion brings death, a reversal of feminism, further violence, and the sexual revolution to the family. Few would argue these promote the well-being of the family. Abortion opposes the best interests of the family. No problem we have in society is greater than the problem we create when we kill innocent unborn human life. The solution to the problem of legal abortion is to live and let the children live, by outlawing abortion.
Endnotes
{155}Shirley L Zimmerman, Understanding Family Policy 8 (2d ed. 1995).
[Previous | Contents]
Copyright © 1997 by Michael G. Smith. All rights reserved.
Michael G. Smith is team leader of an object-oriented internet development
project at Banc One Services Corporation in Columbus, OH. He can
be contacted at obeng@softwarelaw.com.
Be a TLC Lifeguard
Before You Leave...
We hope you enjoy our web site and find it useful as a resource center.
Please take a moment to rate our site.
Will you help?
Will you help us continue to make this resource
available to thousands of monthly visitors from around the world?
Yes
Texans for Life Coalition
P.O. Box 177727
Irving, TX 75017-7727
(972) 790-9044
webservant@texlife.org
|