Embryo Adoption: Science and Compassion
For the Least of These
Grace's story is a cautionary tale of what can happen when medicine and science outrun moral reasoning.
by
by Tom Neven
Her name is Grace. She's very cute, and her parents love her very
much — both sets of them.
Grace is a special girl. The woman she lives with in Southern
California, Elizabeth, is her legal and biological mother. Elizabeth
is not, however, her genetic mother. Grace's genetic mom lives in
the Midwest.
Grace's story is one of God's love, providence and, well ... grace. It
is also, however, a cautionary tale of what can happen when
medicine and science outrun moral reasoning.
A moral dilemma
Grace began life as all humans do, as
an embryo. But Grace was created
outside the womb in a process called
in vitro fertilization — she's a
"test-tube" baby. The sperm and egg
of a husband and wife were brought
together in a laboratory, where Grace
was conceived. In fact, more than 20
other eggs were fertilized at that time.
That married couple in the Midwest
was undergoing fertility treatment;
several of the fertilized eggs were
transplanted back into the mother's
womb, and she later gave birth.
The remaining embryos were frozen in tanks of liquid nitrogen.
After the mother gave birth, the university hospital where the
remaining embryos were stored asked the parents what they would
like to do with them. And then the realization hit. Any one of those
frozen embryos could have been their newborn child. They were in
fact the child's brothers and sisters, since they were biologically
human and created from the same batch of sperm and eggs.
That family faced a dilemma. What to do with the remaining
embryos? Destroying them was out of the question.
Waiting on God
Switch to Southern California. Elizabeth and her husband, Zach,*
had been trying for many years to conceive children and had
undergone fertility treatments of many kinds. Finally, they were
called into their doctor's office in January 1997. The call sounded
serious.
"I was waiting for him to tell me I had cancer," Elizabeth says. The
news, as far as Elizabeth was concerned, was worse. They could
never have children. "I was so devastated, I thought it would have
been better if he'd told me I had cancer," she recalls. "I couldn't
believe I was never going to feel a baby kick inside me. It goes
beyond just wanting a child."
Their doctor proposed in vitro fertilization, but it would have to be
with a donated egg. "I wasn't too sure about that," Elizabeth says.
Her church denomination believed that in vitro fertilization was
ethical only if the sperm and egg came from a married couple.
Months passed. Elizabeth and Zach in the meantime went through
the full background check, a "home study," required to legally adopt
in California. Elizabeth made this entry in her journal on Nov. 19,
1997: "I've been praying that God would take this desire [to have a
baby] away from me if He doesn't want it to work out."
Shortly after that journal entry, Elizabeth and Zach attended a
Christmas play with Ron Stoddart, a lawyer friend who worked for
Christian Adoption and Family Services in Brea, Calif. One line in
that play struck both Elizabeth and Ron.
"In the intricate design of each flake of snow we find the Creator
reflecting the uniqueness of the individual person." Snowflake.
Frozen embryo!
If Elizabeth and Zach used a frozen embryo, they would not violate
the husband/wife bond, Elizabeth would be able to experience
pregnancy and childbirth, and a child being held in a "frozen
orphanage," as Ron calls it, would have a chance at life.
But Elizabeth and Zach insisted that if they were to go forward with
the procedure, the embryo would have to be legally adopted as any
other child would be, and it would have to be an open adoption,
meaning the child would know who her genetic family was and
would remain in contact with them in some form.
No coincidences
Elizabeth and Zach had been in touch with Focus on the Family
and had met Sydna Massé, then the head of Focus' Crisis
Pregnancy Ministries. They told her about their idea of adopting a
frozen embryo.
Sydna recalls having lunch with Elizabeth and Zach, after which she
gave them a handmade afghan blanket, which had been donated
to Focus to give to "a special child."
"I know God is going to give you a child," Sydna told them, "so I
want to be the first to present you with a baby gift."
Unknown to any of the three, the family in the Midwest had been in
touch with counselors at Focus on the Family. One later
approached Sydna with a real stumper: He knew a mother in the
Midwest who had 20 frozen embryos she wanted to place for
adoption.
Sydna was excited. "I have just the referral for you!" she said.
A miracle
The two couples were introduced and arrangements were made to
send the embryos to California. Elizabeth spoke on the phone with
the genetic mother on New Year's Day, 1998.
"I was nervous for maybe the first second," Elizabeth recalls, "and
then we just hit it off. As we've gotten to know each other, we just
find more and more similarities with each other."
Twenty frozen embryos were shipped to California. The doctor first
chose 12 of the 20 to thaw. Only three survived the thawing
process, and they were transferred to Elizabeth's womb in March
1998. None implanted in the wall of the uterus; Elizabeth was not
pregnant.
Only eight embryos remained. They would try again Easter
weekend. Only three of the eight survived that thawing, and they too
were transferred into Elizabeth.
"Easter weekend is when we celebrate new life," Elizabeth says.
"Grace came back to life that weekend when she was transferred
into me."
The rest of the story
Grace was born Dec. 31, 1998. As
she grows she'll get to know her
genetic siblings in the Midwest. And
for her genetic parents, there is also a
form of God's forgiveness. If Elizabeth
had gotten pregnant on the first try,
they might still have frozen children
waiting to be born. But in God's
sovereignty, all of the 20 remaining
embryos were used, and He chose
one to create Grace.
"We didn't set out to be crusaders,"
Zach says. "We just wanted a baby.
But if you said we could go back and
have our own genetic kids but not
have Grace, we'd say no way."
Appendix
On the Medical and Legal Frontier
As medicine and science delve ever deeper into solving problems
of infertility, they have raced ahead of both legal and ethical
thinking on the subject.
For example, while no one knows exactly how many frozen
embryos are in storage in North America, some estimate there to
be as many as 100,000 human embryos held in cryogenic banks.
One concrete number to consider: In 1996, the last year for which
complete records are available, doctors conducted 8,661 transfers
of frozen embryos, using an average of 3.5 embryos per transfer,
according to the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. But
doctors frequently fertilize as many as 30 eggs at a time during in
vitro procedures. The remaining 20-plus embryos are then either
destroyed or, more frequently, frozen. According to many doctors,
theologians and medical ethicists, those frozen embryos are fully
human.
Many considerations
One thing many doctors do not think about is the emotional impact
on parents when they learn they have frozen embryos remaining,
according to Dr. Joe McIlhaney, an ob/gyn and founder of the
Medical Institute for Sexual Health in Austin, Texas.
"Most [fertility] programs don't even discuss this with patients," he
says. "That patient gets pregnant and then realizes any one of
those other embryos could have been this baby." That realization,
he says, hits hard. "There's a sense of desperation, a sense of guilt
that they didn't investigate this more."
McIlhaney says that patients considering in vitro fertilization must
clearly state their beliefs before the doctor ever begins. "First, it's
not necessary to fertilize so many eggs," he says. "To plan not to
transfer all embryos back to the mother or to plan to kill them shows
great disdain for what those embryos are."
McIlhaney says couples should state they don't want a single
embryo destroyed unless medically it is incompatible with life.
(Such embryos usually miscarry spontaneously.) "The doctor
should fertilize only the number of eggs that will be put back in the
woman's body during the present cycle or in future cycles," he says.
Generally, no more than two or three embryos should be
transferred each time.
From a legal standpoint, both the genetic parents and the receiving
couple must do their homework, according to Ron Stoddart of
Christian Adoption and Family Services in Brea, Calif. Stoddart
founded the Snowflakes Embryo Adoption Program in response to
the growing controversy over what to do with frozen embryos.
"If we believe the embryos are preborn babies and are entitled to
the same legal protection as a born child, then an [adoption] home
study is in order," he says. This also gives the genetic parents
greater control over where the embryos are placed.
For the receiving family, Stoddart cautions, "Don't live in a fantasy.
You must tell the child he's adopted. With a frozen embryo, it's
tempting not to tell him because you carried him and gave birth to
him."
This is true even if the adoption is "closed," that is, neither set of
parents knows the other. In such cases, it is especially important to
work with a reputable agency. The agency will know the medical
background of the genetic parents. "Whatever you do," he warns,
"do not buy a frozen embryo, and do not work through 'facilitators'
or search [for donors] using the Internet.
"Be sure to get something in writing from the genetic parents to
transfer the embryos, sort of like 'transferring title,' " Stoddart says.
Stoddart sees an additional opportunity arising from the legal and
medical conundrum, however.
"Right now the law is way behind in areas of reproductive
technologies," he says. No state fully recognizes a frozen embryo
as a human being, although Stoddart says some case law is
developing in that direction. And as more case law develops, this
provides more legal protection for the unborn with regard to
abortion.
"The danger legislators see is if they give embryos the same rights
as a person, this conflicts with their abortion statutes," he says.
"But we want to give any unborn embryo the same rights as a
baby."
This article appeared in Focus on the Family magazine. Copyright © 1999
Focus on the Family. All rights reserved. International copyright secured.
To contact Christian Adoption and Family Services or to learn more about the
Snowflakes Embryo Adoption Program, write 1698 Greenbriar Lane, Suite 219,
Brea, CA 92821. Call (714) 529-2949 or e-mail info@snowflakes.org.
Be a TLC Lifeguard
Before You Leave...
We hope you enjoy our web site and find it useful as a resource center.
Please take a moment to rate our site.
Will you help?
Will you help us continue to make this resource
available to thousands of monthly visitors from around the world?
Yes
Texans for Life Coalition
P.O. Box 177727
Irving, TX 75017-7727
(972) 790-9044
webservant@texlife.org
|